From a rock shelterRock shelterA shallow cavity at the foot of a cliff or under a rocky overhang, offering natural shelter; a favoured site of prehistoric habitation and rock art.→ in central Spain, a simple granite pebble has yielded a 43,000-year-old secret: a fingerprint marked with red ochreOchreA red or yellow mineral pigment (iron oxides), used from prehistory for adornment, funerary rites and art.→, attributed to a Neanderthal. The study, published on May 5, 2026 in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, reignites the debate over our extinct cousins' capacity for symbolic behavior.1
A pebble carried from the Eresma River
The San Lazaro rock shelter near Segovia, Spain, has long yielded Middle Paleolithic tools associated with Neanderthal occupation. During a 2022 excavation campaign conducted by a team from the CSIC, Complutense University of Madrid, and the University of Salamanca, archaeologists unearthed a granite pebble buried under nearly one and a half meters of sediment. The object immediately stood out: its surface was smooth, with no signs of knappingknappingThe set of operations for fracturing a stone block to extract flakes or blades.→ or practical use.
Luminescence datingLuminescence datingA method dating the last heating or light exposure of sediments and minerals by measuring energy trapped in the crystal.→ places the stratigraphic level between 45,000 and 41,000 years ago - a window during which only Neanderthal groups occupied this region of Spain, before the arrival of Homo sapiensHomo sapiensThe present-day human species, which emerged in Africa around 300,000 years ago, the only surviving human lineage after the extinction of Neanderthals and Denisovans.→ on the Iberian Peninsula. Even more striking is the pebble's origin: it belongs to a lithological type absent from the site itself, found only in the alluvial deposits of the Eresma River, more than five kilometers away. Someone deliberately carried this stone to the campsite - already a meaningful act in itself.2
A complete fingerprint beneath the red ochre
Multispectral analysis revealed on the pebble's surface a red ochre stain composed of clay and iron oxides. Beneath this pigment deposit, a dermatoglyphic examination conducted in collaboration with the Spanish forensic police identified a complete fingerprint - the most detailed ever recorded on an object of such antiquity.
The reconstruction proposed by the research team is striking: an individual - likely male, aged 18 to 25 based on the morphology of the papillary ridges - appears to have pressed the right index finger into the still-wet pigment, leaving a trace on the stone's surface. The position of the fingerprint, located near natural prominences of the rock, led some researchers to interpret the ensemble as a sketched face, with the ochre dot serving as a nose. Other teams remain more cautious about this iconographic reading, but none dispute the intentional nature of the pigment application itself.3
Neanderthal symbolic behavior in question
Long dismissed as incapable of abstract thought, Neanderthals have seen their image transformed dramatically over the past two decades. Excavations at Shanidar (Iraq) reopened the debate on their funerary practices; finds at the Arene Candide cave (Italy) confirmed the use of personal ornaments; cave paintings at La Pasiega (Spain), dated to more than 65,000 years ago - before the arrival of Homo sapiens - attributed a rudimentary form of rock art to them. The San Lazaro discovery fits squarely within this series of revelations.
Deliberately applying pigment to a stone with no evident practical purpose constitutes what researchers call symbolic behavior: an action whose significance transcends pure survival economics. This capacity was long considered the exclusive hallmark of Homo sapiens, a marker of the "behavioral modernity" thought to have given our species the edge over all others. San Lazaro complicates that picture.4
Experts divided on interpretation
The study brings together multiple voices, not all in agreement on the most ambitious conclusions. Anthropologist Bruce Hardy of Kenyon College (USA) unequivocally confirms the intentional application of ochre and the reality of the fingerprint, but declines to attribute a specifically artistic intent. Archaeologist Rebecca Wragg Sykes, a leading specialist in Neanderthals, agrees the gesture is symbolic in nature but considers the interpretation of the red dot as "a nose on a face" too speculative given current evidence.
Paul Pettitt of Durham University sees it primarily as another example of controlled red pigment use by Neanderthals - a practice now documented across several European sites - without ruling on the precise significance of this particular pebble. These caveats do not diminish the discovery's importance: whatever the final interpretation, ochre was intentionally applied to a selected and transported stone, by an individual whose biological identity is, for once, beyond doubt - a Neanderthal, 43,000 years ago.
No comments yet. Be the first.